St Vincent and the Grenadines Pauses Constitutional Amendment After Public Backlash
St Vincent Pauses Constitutional Amendment After Backlash

Government Halts Controversial Bills Amid Protests

The St Vincent and the Grenadines government has paused a controversial effort to amend the constitution after public backlash. The bills aimed to clarify citizenship eligibility for members of parliament, a move critics say protects Prime Minister Godwin Friday, who holds dual Canadian and Vincentian citizenship.

Background of the Dispute

Two bills were drafted after opposition election petitions challenged the eligibility of Friday and MP Dwight Fitzgerald Bramble, both dual citizens. The petitions are scheduled for hearing in July at the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court.

Public Outcry and Government Response

Amid online outrage and protests near parliament, Friday told lawmakers he would delay the bills to allow more public debate. 'We will not be proceeding any further now at this point until we have had these full responses from the public debate on these two very important matters,' he said.

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

Constitutional Concerns

The bills seek to redefine 'foreign power or state' to exclude Commonwealth countries, potentially allowing dual citizens from Commonwealth nations to hold office. Critics, including former Prime Minister Ralph Gonsalves, warn of a 'constitutional crisis' and undermining the rule of law.

Law lecturer Adrian Odle questioned the timing, noting that changing the constitution while a case is before the court raises concerns about genuine reform versus political expediency.

Regional Context

Dual citizenship remains contentious in the Caribbean. In Jamaica, opposition leader Mark Golding gave up his British citizenship amid pressure during elections. Journalist Calistra Farrier highlighted a broader tension between inherited Westminster governance and modern realities like dual citizenship.

The government senator Jemalie John defended the bills, arguing that parliament must resolve ambiguities to protect voters' democratic choice, while the court will assess the pending case.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration