UK cancels Kenya army training over jurisdiction and funding dispute
UK cancels Kenya army training over jurisdiction dispute

The British army has cancelled a planned training exercise in Kenya after the Kenyan government refused to ratify a bilateral defence agreement, citing concerns over jurisdiction for prosecuting British soldiers and funding.

Dispute over jurisdiction and funding

The UK government sought to renew the existing agreement, but Kenyan lawmakers demanded changes to give local authorities greater powers to hold British soldiers accountable for offences committed in the country. According to the Kenyan news outlet the Daily Nation, the dispute centres on which cases Kenya will retain primary jurisdiction over, while the amount of money Britain pays Kenya to host the training camp has also been a sticking point.

Nelson Koech, chair of the Kenyan national assembly’s defence, intelligence and foreign relations committee, said the two governments were “actively engaging to address these outstanding issues”.

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

Exercise cancelled

As a result, a planned exercise involving the 1st Battalion the Duke of Lancaster’s Regiment, due to begin in September, has been cancelled. A Ministry of Defence spokesperson said: “The UK highly values its relationship with Kenya, which is underpinned by mutual benefit, respect and cooperation. The UK-Kenya Defence Partnership is one of the great strengths of our relationship. Our joint training and operations with the Kenyan Defence Forces are keeping both Kenyan and British people safe.

“It is with regret that the necessary licences required to allow training to take place in Laikipia later this year have not been forthcoming. As a result, the planned training will now be conducted at an alternative location outside Kenya.”

Economic impact and ongoing concerns

Kenya benefits from training of its own armed forces at BATUK, the British army base near Nanyuki, and the presence of British troops is valuable for the economy. The MoD spokesperson added: “We recognise the disappointment this decision will cause for those who would have benefited from the economic activity generated by the exercise.”

They said the UK government remained “committed to our defence partnership with Kenya”, adding that the UK would “continue to engage closely with the Kenyan government to support the resumption of training in-country at the earliest appropriate opportunity”.

Pressure from Kenyan people

However, there has been sustained pressure from Kenyan people opposed to the British army’s continued presence. Last year, a report to the Kenyan parliament into the base alleged human rights violations, environmental destruction and sexual abuse by British soldiers. The most high-profile case linked to the base is the death of Agnes Wanjiru, in which a British soldier, Robert Purkiss, has been charged with murder. Kenya has retained jurisdiction in the case, and an extradition hearing is due in November. Purkiss denies the charge.

Legal proceedings had stalled since Wanjiru’s death in 2012 but advanced under John Healey’s tenure as defence secretary. As shadow defence secretary, he had called on the previous government to do more to progress the case. Koech said the committee had called for “stronger accountability measures, including jurisdiction over serious offences, enhanced protection for local communities, and implementation of recommendations arising from the BATUK inquiry”.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration