Dining Across the Divide: A Scientist and a Lawyer Debate Monarchy and Politics
Dining Across the Divide: Scientist vs Lawyer on Monarchy

Keith, a 48-year-old university lecturer in medical microbiology from Leeds, and Amanda, a 67-year-old family lawyer from Doncaster, sat down for a meal at the Salutation in Doncaster as part of a series aimed at bridging political divides. Despite their differing views, they found unexpected agreement on several topics.

First Impressions

Keith admitted he was nervous about who he would be paired with but found Amanda an excellent dinner companion. Amanda, initially anxious, said she had a great evening and was surprised by how much they agreed on.

The Meal

They started with Thai fish cakes, sweet chilli ribs, and lamb meatballs. Keith enjoyed a pork and holy basil stir-fry topped with a fried egg, paired with a local beer called Little Critters. Amanda, trying Thai food for the first time, had a red salmon curry, and they shared a pancake and cake for dessert.

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

The Big Debate: Monarchy

Keith argued that the monarchy should have been abolished long ago, citing the lack of consequences for Prince Andrew despite his scandals. Amanda countered by questioning what would replace it, noting that the monarchy brings in revenue and is politically neutral. Keith agreed that the monarchy acts as a safety valve but still favors abolition. Amanda respects his republican views but urges realism over ideology.

Flags and Identity

Keith dislikes the far-right co-opting of the St George's flag and union jack but believes banning them would make them symbols of oppression. Amanda strongly opposes the flags, comparing them to Germany in the 1930s and 1940s, as she feels they send a message of white British exclusivity.

Political Views

Keith criticizes Keir Starmer for not being bold enough, particularly the freezing of tax thresholds, which he calls a tax on the poor. He finds the Labour party's obsession with Peter Mandelson baffling and thinks Starmer is a "dead man walking." Amanda is kinder to Starmer, acknowledging he is an excellent lawyer but not a natural politician. She believes things are improving, despite potholes and war-related issues.

Final Thoughts

Keith advocates for more discussions across divides, warning against cultural ghettoization. Amanda enjoyed the challenge of being made to think again. Both agreed on the value of respectful dialogue.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration