Labour's New Immigration Plan Sparks Controversy with 20-Year Wait
Labour's immigration reforms praised by Tommy Robinson

Labour's shadow justice secretary Shabana Mahmood has unveiled controversial new immigration proposals that have drawn unexpected praise from far-right activist Tommy Robinson while causing consternation among human rights advocates.

Radical Shift in Immigration Policy

During a parliamentary speech on Monday, Mahmood outlined sweeping changes to the UK's immigration system that represent a significant shift to the right for the Labour party. The proposals have created deep divisions within political circles and beyond.

Tommy Robinson, the founder of the English Defence League, enthusiastically welcomed Labour's new direction, writing on social media: "The Overton window has been obliterated. Well done patriots." This endorsement from a prominent far-right figure has raised eyebrows across the political spectrum.

Key Measures Announced

The proposed measures include several hardline policies that mark a departure from Labour's traditional stance on immigration. According to the announcement, refugees could now face waits of up to 20 years before obtaining indefinite leave to remain in the UK.

Other controversial elements include provisions for deporting asylum-seeking families and even plans to confiscate valuables from asylum seekers at the border. These measures have been described as particularly harsh by refugee support organisations.

Jessica Elgot, the Guardian's deputy political editor, expressed surprise at the proposals gaining support within Labour ranks. "I think it's extraordinary that something like this can get the support of Keir Starmer, the former human rights lawyer, and actually a significant chunk of Labour MPs," she told Helen Pidd on the Today in Focus podcast.

Defence and Criticism

Mahmood has defended the proposals as necessary measures to bring the immigration system under control and prevent the issue from further dividing the country. She insists that a more managed approach is needed to maintain public confidence in the immigration system.

However, critics argue that the plans create what amounts to a "hostile environment" for vulnerable people seeking protection in the UK. The potential seizure of assets from asylum seekers has drawn particular criticism for its severity.

The proposals represent a significant political calculation by Labour as they attempt to address voter concerns about immigration while maintaining their core values. The reception from both ends of the political spectrum indicates how contentious this balancing act has become.

As the debate continues, all eyes will be on how these proposals develop and whether they will form part of Labour's official manifesto in the coming elections.