Chalk controversy has erupted at the Crucible, with Neil Robertson calling for a ban on the chalk brand used by Ronnie O'Sullivan. The debate centers on the rise of Taom chalk, a Finnish brand that has become the preferred choice for nearly all professional players. Taom produces fewer kicks and leaves fewer marks on the cloth, improving the game's consistency. However, O'Sullivan remains loyal to Triangle, the traditional chalk that many players have abandoned.
Robertson's Criticism
After defeating Chris Wakelin in the second round of the World Championship, Robertson did not hold back. "Ban that crap, please!" he said. "All the players hate it, it destroys the game. You get kicks, you get bounces. Not only that, it makes an absolute mess of the table." He compared O'Sullivan's chalk marks to artwork, referencing his friendship with artist Damien Hirst. "I don't think he does it to put off anyone, but it's not great. It's hard enough to play Ronnie O'Sullivan, but he's the only player, just about, on tour who uses that chalk. Hopefully they bring in a ban."
Fairness Concerns
Robertson emphasized the unfairness. "It's not really fair for the players who aren't using it. It can be used tactically if someone wanted to, which I don't think should be allowed in the game." He noted that even snooker clubs are banning Triangle chalk. "Why are we using it?"
Higgins' Perspective
John Higgins, who edged O'Sullivan 13-12 in a thrilling match, acknowledged the challenge. "Ronnie was by far the better player, his cue ball was amazing. But there are circumstances why that is because we all know he uses the other chalk... it's tough to play against." He added, "Why wouldn't you take the advantage when you have got a better cue ball control than every other player?"
O'Sullivan's Loyalty
O'Sullivan has not commented on the calls for a ban. His use of Triangle chalk remains a distinctive aspect of his game, but many in the snooker world are pushing for uniform equipment standards to ensure a level playing field.
