Australian politician admits texting 'my job is boring', denies sex worker claim
Politician admits texting 'my job is boring', denies sex worker

Australian Capital Territory opposition leader Mark Parton has admitted to sending a text message that read 'my job is boring' during a committee meeting, but he firmly denies that it was sent to a sex worker. The admission came on Thursday, after the Liberal Party leader initially dismissed the complaint as a 'smear'.

Text message scandal unfolds

According to the Canberra Times, Parton reportedly wrote, 'And f*** my job is boring. Wanna swap,' accompanied by a picture of a committee meeting from last month. The complaint alleged that the message was directed to a sex worker, a claim that Parton has consistently rejected.

Speaking to journalists on Thursday, Parton said, 'Again, I'm sorry. I'm not going to entertain questions that are completely removed from that and that are not in the public interest. I'm just not going there.' He did not disclose the recipient of the message but defended his actions, arguing that he was still 'holding the government to account'.

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

Politician defends private messages

Parton explained that such private exchanges are common during long sitting days and hearings. 'There's a hell of a lot of private messages that are sent from a hell of a lot of people in the context of sitting days and hearings,' he said. 'I think it's appropriate to send private messages to people that are not designed for the public realm.'

He also acknowledged his communication style, saying, 'I've got an off-the-cuff larrikin communication style,' using an Australian slang term for someone with an irreverent sense of humour.

Complaint dismissed, police referred

The official complaint has since been dismissed, and Parton has referred the matter to police, citing alleged 'harassment'. The incident has sparked discussions about the appropriateness of private messages sent by public officials during official proceedings.

This is not the first time an Australian politician has faced scrutiny over private communications. The case highlights the delicate balance between personal expression and public accountability.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration