Dr John Pickering has written a letter to The Guardian rejecting the notion that artificial intelligence systems could ever become conscious. In his response to an article by neuroscientist Anil Seth, Pickering argues that AI systems like Claude are fundamentally incapable of consciousness, just as a washing machine cannot become pregnant. He calls for a resounding rejection of such ideas, criticizing Seth for being merely unsure rather than certain.
Key Argument Against AI Consciousness
Pickering states, 'It’s not like anything to be Claude, just as it’s not like anything to be a washing machine.' He emphasizes that common sense, not academic education, is sufficient to recognize this. According to Pickering, AI systems simulate experience but do not actually possess it. He writes, 'Used well Claude is of great benefit. But because it can simulate having experience doesn’t mean it actually has it.'
Criticism of Anil Seth's Position
Pickering expresses disappointment with Seth's equivocation on the matter, stating, 'Such tepid equivocation from leading figures in the field is disappointing; only resounding rejection will do.' He references Richard Dawkins as another figure who seems unsure, contrasting their stance with the certainty Pickering believes is necessary.
Conclusion
The letter concludes by asserting that AI systems won't become conscious for the same reason they won't become pregnant: 'they’re not that sort of thing.' Pickering urges a firm rejection of any notion of AI consciousness.
