Former US President Donald Trump found himself at the centre of an international controversy after accepting an extraordinary gift during his visit to South Korea - a gleaming golden crown fit for royalty.
A Regal Reception Sparks Outrage
The lavish presentation occurred during Trump's meeting with South Korean political figures, where he was honoured with the ornate crown in what organisers described as a gesture of respect. However, the symbolic gift immediately triggered backlash across the nation.
Street protests erupted in Seoul, with demonstrators carrying placards declaring 'No Kings in Democracy' and 'Republic Rejects Crowns'. The spectacle drew sharp criticism from political opponents and constitutional experts alike.
Constitutional Concerns Raised
South Korea's democratic constitution explicitly prohibits bestowing royal titles or honours that suggest monarchical power. Legal experts have questioned whether the gift violates the spirit, if not the letter, of the nation's foundational laws.
One constitutional scholar commented: "This isn't just about a gift - it's about preserving the democratic principles that define modern South Korea. Royal symbolism has no place in our republic."
Political Fallout Spreads
The controversy comes at a sensitive time in South Korean politics, with critics accusing the hosting politicians of undermining democratic norms for political theatre. Opposition parties have demanded investigations into the funding and approval process for the extravagant gift.
Meanwhile, Trump's representatives have defended accepting the crown, describing it as a cultural gesture of friendship rather than a political statement. They emphasised that gift-giving is a common diplomatic practice.
Public Reaction Divided
Public opinion appears split between those who see the gift as harmless protocol and others who view it as dangerously symbolic. Social media has exploded with memes and commentary, with the hashtag #CrownGate trending across platforms.
As the debate continues, the golden crown incident highlights the delicate balance between diplomatic courtesy and constitutional integrity in modern international relations.
