Royal Legal Troubles: From Monmouth's Rebellion to Windsor's Nazi Ties
In response to recent discussions on royal encounters with the law, readers have highlighted significant historical cases that extend beyond minor offenses, shedding light on deeper legal and moral issues within the monarchy.
Major Historical Cases Overlooked
Simon Jenkins' article on royal run-ins with the law focused on fines and minor incidents, but readers point to two pivotal events with far-reaching consequences. First, in 1685, James Scott, the Duke of Monmouth and illegitimate son of Charles II, led a rebellion against King James II. After his defeat at the Battle of Sedgemoor, Monmouth was tried and sentenced to a brutal execution, though he was spared the worst and beheaded after multiple axe strokes by Jack Ketch.
Second, the Glorious Revolution of 1688, led by Monmouth's half-sister Mary and William III, challenged the law of the land in a less violent coup, which some historians view as a foundational moment for the modern world.
Duke of Windsor's Alleged Treason
Another critical case involves the Duke of Windsor, who was implicated in collaboration with Nazi Germany during World War II. The Marburg files, discovered in 1945, contained telegrams suggesting his support for peace through heavy bombing of England. Winston Churchill suppressed these files to protect the monarchy, and King George VI learned of them in 1953. Had the duke been tried, he could have faced a death sentence for treason, but he lived in luxury until his death in 1972.
Broader Implications for Monarchy
Readers argue that the royal family's inherited privilege fosters corruption and entitlement, as seen in cases like Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor. They contend that the system lacks a moral basis, making it unfair to single out individuals for removal from succession without addressing the broader issues of an inherited monarchy.
Some suggest that alternative governance arrangements could mitigate these risks, while others call for a complete reevaluation of the royal family's role in society.
Public Opinion and Future Debates
These letters underscore ongoing public scrutiny of the monarchy's legal and ethical standing. From historical rebellions to modern scandals, the discussion invites reflection on how society envisions justice and governance in relation to royal institutions.
