Mike Pender has called on the UK's Food Standards Agency (FSA) to update its guidance on ultra-processed foods, arguing that regulation is the most effective way to control profit-oriented companies. His comments come in response to an article by Felicity Lawrence, published on 7 August, which examined why food firms are panicking and resorting to legal action.
FSA's Role in Public Health
The FSA, an independent non-ministerial government department, has a primary statutory objective to protect public health from risks arising from food consumption. According to Pender, its advice to ministers and guidance to consumers are informed by the most up-to-date scientific evidence, free from political or commercial influences.
Lawrence's article highlighted that food manufacturers view government action as a threat. Pender agrees, stating, "Regulation is surely the most effective way to control profit-oriented companies, many of which pay little regard to the possible negative impact of their products until compelled to do so."
Call for Updated Guidance
The FSA last published consumer guidance on ultra-processed foods in February 2025. Pender suggests that, given the science on the harm caused by foods high in fat, salt, and sugar is now settled, it may be time for the FSA to consider updating this guidance and whether to recommend government intervention.
Pender's letter, from Cardiff, was written in response to Lawrence's piece, which detailed the panic and lawsuits from ultra-processed food firms as they sense time running out.
Implications for Public Health Policy
The call for updated guidance reflects growing concerns over the health impacts of ultra-processed foods. With the science settled, Pender argues that the FSA should take a more proactive role in recommending regulatory measures to curb the negative effects of these products.
As the debate continues, the FSA's next steps will be closely watched by public health advocates and the food industry alike.
