An ABC executive who oversaw the controversial sacking of journalist Antoinette Lattouf received a staggering £836,000 payment for just eight months of work, newly released documents have revealed.
The eye-watering compensation package was disclosed in the Australian Broadcasting Corporation's annual report, exposing a massive pay disparity at the heart of the public broadcaster during a period of intense internal turmoil.
Executive Rewards Amid Staff Unrest
While the ABC was embroiled in the highly publicised termination of presenter Antoinette Lattouf, senior management continued to receive premium compensation packages. The £836,000 payment covered the executive's final eight months of employment, averaging approximately £104,500 per month.
The revelation comes at a sensitive time for the national broadcaster, which has faced mounting criticism over its handling of staff disputes and perceived political interference in editorial decisions.
Lattouf Dismissal Controversy
Antoinette Lattouf's dismissal in late 2023 sparked widespread condemnation and legal action, with the journalist alleging she was terminated for expressing pro-Palestinian views. The case has become a flashpoint for debates about media freedom and diversity within Australian broadcasting.
Now, the substantial executive payment raises fresh questions about spending priorities at the taxpayer-funded organisation, particularly when compared to the treatment of on-air talent.
Public Broadcaster Accountability
The ABC, which receives over A$1 billion annually in government funding, faces increased scrutiny over its executive remuneration policies. The latest figures show:
- Multiple senior executives receiving packages exceeding £500,000
 - Growing disparity between management and production staff salaries
 - Increased public pressure for transparency in spending
 
Media analysts suggest the timing of this revelation could not be worse for the broadcaster, which is already navigating complex political pressures and audience trust issues.
The substantial payment to the departing executive, while the organisation was cutting costs and facing legal battles over staff terminations, is likely to fuel ongoing debates about appropriate spending at public broadcasters.