Woolworths Faces Court Over Alleged Fake Discounts Amid Inflation Crisis
Woolworths Court Case on Fake Discounts Amid Inflation

Consumer Watchdog Targets Woolworths in Federal Court Over Alleged Deceptive Pricing

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has initiated legal proceedings against Woolworths, Australia's largest supermarket chain, accusing it of misleading shoppers with fake discounts. This case, which commenced in the federal court in Sydney, focuses on everyday grocery items such as Tim Tams, apple cider vinegar, and baby rice, scrutinizing their shelf prices over a two-week period.

Allegations of Illusory Discounts During Economic Upheaval

The ACCC alleges that Woolworths violated Australian consumer law by offering "illusory" discounts through its "Prices Dropped" promotion program. According to the watchdog, between September 2021 and May 2023, Woolworths temporarily increased prices on at least 266 products before placing them on promotions at prices that were higher than or equal to their original costs. This strategy, known as "was/is" comparative pricing, is said to have misled consumers during a time of significant economic upheaval and widespread concern over the cost of living.

Woolworths has strongly denied the allegations, with a spokesperson stating that the company "fundamentally disagrees" with the ACCC's claims and did not mislead customers. The supermarket argues that its "Prices Dropped" program was designed to provide value amid extraordinary inflation pressures post-COVID, working with suppliers to mitigate cost increases for shoppers.

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

Broader Context and Similar Cases

This legal action follows a similar case against Coles, where hearings concluded two months prior. In that instance, Coles admitted to planning promotional prices after price spikes but denied misleading consumers, citing genuine discounts due to rising wholesale costs. The ACCC is expected to present a comparable argument against Woolworths, with Justice Michael O'Brien yet to rule on the Coles matter.

The hearings occur against a backdrop of sharp grocery price increases and reputational damage for major supermarkets, which have been the focus of multiple parliamentary inquiries. Additionally, suppliers are requesting price hikes to cover inflated fuel and fertiliser costs, further complicating the economic landscape.

Products Under Scrutiny and Legal Defense

The court will examine a narrowed list of 12 products, including Arnott's Tim Tams, Tiny Teddies, Bragg apple cider vinegar, and Nestlé Cerelac baby rice. The ACCC claims that Woolworths planned in many cases to later place these items on "Prices Dropped" promotions after temporary price increases.

Led by Robert Yezerski, SC, Woolworths' legal team is prepared to vigorously defend against the allegations, emphasizing the company's efforts to support customers during inflationary periods. As consumer anxiety over living costs grows amid fresh inflation and potential interest rate rises, this case highlights ongoing tensions between regulatory oversight and retail practices in Australia's supermarket sector.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration