A Delaware state judge has dismissed a defamation lawsuit brought by UnitedHealth Group against the Guardian, ruling that the healthcare conglomerate's claims lacked merit. The lawsuit, filed in May 2025, targeted an investigative report that revealed UnitedHealth made secret payments to nursing homes to reduce hospital transfers for residents.
Ruling Details
Delaware Superior Court Judge Calvin Scott granted the Guardian's motion to dismiss all six defamation claims on Monday. Scott found that the Guardian's reporting was substantially true, noting that describing bonuses as 'secret' or made 'secretly' was accurate. He also stated that the Guardian was not required to publish facts UnitedHealth preferred and that omissions did not render statements false.
Background of the Case
UnitedHealth Group, the largest health insurer in the US, sued the Guardian US and its UK parent over a 2025 investigation. The article alleged that UnitedHealth quietly paid nursing homes to keep residents from being transferred to hospitals, potentially affecting patient care. The Guardian moved to dismiss, arguing UnitedHealth failed to state a viable claim, while the UK parent cited lack of personal jurisdiction.
Response from the Guardian
Guardian US General Counsel Kai Falkenberg welcomed the decision, calling it 'a resounding victory for factual reporting and the First Amendment.' She added that the Guardian continued to publish new details during the lawsuit, and the ruling rejected UnitedHealth's 'bullying and intimidation tactics.'
Next Steps
As of Tuesday morning, UnitedHealth had not issued a public statement. The company may appeal the ruling. The Guardian has sought comment from UnitedHealth.
