Canada's STCA Forces Asylum Seekers into US Deportation, Critics Say
Canada's STCA Forces Asylum Seekers into US Deportation

A Honduran family fleeing gang violence was separated at the Canadian border and ultimately deported after being denied entry under the Safe Third Country Agreement (STCA). The case is central to a new court challenge alleging Canada fails to uphold court-ordered protections for asylum seekers.

Family Forced Back to Danger

Carlos and Antonia, with their toddler Alejandro, fled Honduras in 2021 after gang threats. After a perilous journey through Guatemala and Mexico, they arrived in the US as Donald Trump's immigration crackdown began. A lawyer warned that pursuing an asylum claim risked detention and deportation.

Because Carlos had family in Canada, they headed north. At the Fort Erie border crossing, a Canadian agent offered a choice: let Carlos and Alejandro enter while Antonia was sent back to the US, or all three return together. The family chose to stay united and were returned to the US, then deported to Honduras.

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

"There was no way I could be separated from my son," Antonia said. "I was completely in shock." The family has gone into hiding in Honduras, fearing retribution from the same gang they fled.

Legal Challenge Against STCA

The Canadian Council for Refugees, Amnesty International Canada, and the three Hondurans are challenging Canadian border officials' failure to apply humanitarian exemptions under the STCA. The agreement, in effect since 2004, requires asylum seekers to claim refuge in the first safe country they reach. Canada's Supreme Court upheld the STCA in 2023, citing "safety valves" that allow exemptions on humanitarian grounds.

Advocates argue these safeguards are illusory. "Every day, people fleeing danger present themselves at the Canadian border expressing grave fears about what will happen to them if they are returned to the US," said Asma Faizi, president of the Canadian Council for Refugees. "While their fears are very real, the 'safety valves' supposedly offered by the Canadian government do not in practice exist."

Flawed Discretion Process

Court documents reveal that asylum seekers are often not informed of their right to seek an exemption and lack legal counsel when making split-second decisions. Canada's border agency states officers have limited discretion to delay removal only in "exceptional cases" where clear evidence of death, inhumane treatment, or deportation without due process exists.

Canada's federal government defends the US as a safe third country, asserting it meets legal requirements. The allegations in the challenge remain untested; a judge must first grant leave for the case to proceed.

"We wish we could show our faces and shout to the world," Carlos said. "But we are doing what we can to fight this."

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration