China's Sea Legend launches Arctic route as Suez alternative
China's Sea Legend launches Arctic route as Suez alternative

China's shipping company Sea Legend has launched the first scheduled container service through the Arctic's Northern Sea Route (NSR), offering a potential alternative to the Strait of Hormuz and Suez Canal. The direct journey from Ningbo-Zhoushan to Felixstowe in the UK takes as little as 18 days, compared with more than 40 days via the Suez Canal, according to Li Xiaobin, chief operating officer of Sea Legend.

Arctic Route Gains Traction Amid Global Shipping Disruptions

The NSR, which runs along Russia's northern coast, is only navigable during warmer months, but that window has widened due to shrinking summer sea ice. Japan, Korea, and India have all expressed interest in sending cargoes through the route, but China is the first to establish a scheduled transit. After a single pilot voyage in 2025, Sea Legend launched a regular service in recent days.

The route is ideal for cargo sensitive to temperature, including electric vehicles, lithium batteries, and solar products, among which China has become a dominant global exporter. As the only regular commercial cargo service on the route, Sea Legend will test whether Beijing's longstanding Arctic ambitions can translate into a viable China-Europe trade route.

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

Political and Environmental Risks Loom Large

The Chinese president, Xi Jinping, first called for China and Russia to develop Arctic shipping routes and build a “polar Silk Road” in 2017. Russia, which controls much of the NSR, was initially wary of China's growing presence but has become increasingly dependent on Beijing after its full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Russia's state nuclear company Rosatom issues navigation permits and oversees shipping, providing nuclear-powered icebreakers that accompany most vessels.

Sea Legend says the Arctic route will roughly halve emissions due to shorter sailing times, but experts warn that environmental risks could erase any savings. Some shipping companies face criticism for using heavy fuel oil (HFO), banned from the Arctic in 2024. According to a 2025 report from the Bellona Environmental Foundation, fuel spills pose huge dangers because HFO is thicker than other types, making cleanup difficult. Oil decomposes more slowly in cold weather and is almost impossible to remove once trapped in ice.

Shadow Fleet and Economic Viability Questioned

Li Xiaobin said this month that the crisis in the Middle East has exposed the vulnerability of the Suez Canal and Strait of Hormuz, heightening the need for alternative routes. Russia's president, Vladimir Putin, echoed those comments. However, international sanctions on Russia could complicate rescue efforts if a vessel gets into trouble, according to Allianz Commercial's 2026 safety and shipping review.

Experts note that much of the NSR traffic is taken up by Moscow's shadow fleet: tankers often operating without insurance or proper oversight, making ad hoc journeys to evade sanctions. “In 2025 there were a hundred such ships under international sanctions – or nearly a third of the cargo ships sailing the route,” wrote Ksenia Vakhrusheva of Bellona in a report last year. In 2026, reports suggest shadow fleet shipments are happening at an even faster rate due to milder summer conditions.

“With the current climate change, we may be able to see more time of the years that the northern sea route will be open for commercial shipping,” said Vinh Thai, professor of logistics and supply chain management at RMIT University, adding that there is some evidence it is already happening. A Russian LNG transporter started an early transit in May, and ship-watchers recently spotted an unprecedented convoy of Russian tankers taking an unusually northern path, reportedly carrying about 8 million barrels of oil and passing within 500 miles of the North Pole.

Despite Russia's efforts, experts say the economics don't add up. Safety concerns, high operating costs, a short sailing season, and sanctions risks will likely continue to constrain Arctic shipping. Any oil spill could be an “environmental as well as economic disaster,” said Thai, “not only for Russia, but also the surrounding area as well. So can the northern sea route be used as a substitute for the strait of Hormuz and the Suez canal? The short answer is no, not for the moment.”

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration