The cricketing world is abuzz with discussion following The Guardian's publication of their definitive list of the 100 greatest Ashes cricketers of all time. This comprehensive ranking has sparked lively debates among fans and experts alike about the merits of various selections and placements.
The Podcast Discussion
On the latest episode of the Ashes Weekly podcast, hosts Max Rushden and Geoff Lemon were joined by cricket experts Emma John and Ali Martin to dissect the controversial list. The panel spent significant time analysing the top 10 placements, with each expert bringing their unique perspective to the heated discussion about which players truly deserve their legendary status in Ashes history.
Controversial Selections
The conversation particularly focused on the contentious nature of ranking cricketers from different eras against each other. The panel debated whether modern players should be judged differently from historical greats, given the evolution of the game, equipment, and playing conditions over the decades of Ashes competition.
The full top 100 list includes players from both England and Australia who have made significant contributions to cricket's oldest and most celebrated rivalry. The selection criteria appeared to balance statistical achievement with iconic moments and lasting impact on the historic contest between the two nations.
Looking Ahead to 2025-26
Interestingly, the timing of this list comes as both teams build toward the next Ashes series scheduled for 2025-26. The discussion inevitably turned to which current players might eventually find their way onto future versions of this prestigious list based on their performances in upcoming contests.
The Guardian's illustrated feature, created by Guardian Design, provides visual context to accompany the rankings, making the comprehensive list more accessible to casual fans and cricket historians alike.
