Neighbours in Bristol have been left baffled after a large garden fence was installed just centimetres from a living room window, completely blocking the view and natural light. The wooden panels were placed in front of an unoccupied home in Lockleaze, Bristol, prompting widespread confusion and mockery on social media.
Fence Installed for Safety?
Workers were seen carrying out construction at the property this week. It is understood that the fencing was erected to protect the house from a nearby parking area and to prevent a potential fall hazard. However, critics argue that a wire fence would have sufficed, allowing light to enter while still ensuring safety.
One neighbour commented: 'When I initially saw the fence, I thought just the same as everyone else who's seen it really – I mean, what were they thinking? It totally blocks the living room window from any light and view. Someone described it as daylight robbery, which did make me laugh!'
The neighbour added: 'A fence was then put up in front of the window as there's a gap between the house and driveway that maybe a small child could fall down, but it blocks the window. All it really needed was some rails, and the natural light would still enter the house. The only reason I can think of is that there is a gap between the house and the parking spot that a child could fall between, but surely a wire fence would stop that possibility and still let natural light through the window.'
Safety Concerns and Social Media Mockery
A local worker explained that the drop from the wall would be considered a hazard, putting pressure on housing providers to prevent such risks. Despite the safety rationale, many have taken to social media to ridicule the fence. One user wrote: 'Oh my goodness, that is beyond stupid!' Another added: 'This is ridiculous, surely the person who put that up must have questioned it? They must have some common sense!'
Rumours initially suggested the property was owned by Bristol City Council, but the council has since confirmed it is not council-owned. The identity of the owner remains unclear.
