South London Councillor Resigns After Drink-Driving Conviction Rocks Local Authority
London councillor resigns after drink-drive conviction

A senior Wandsworth councillor has dramatically resigned from his position after being convicted of drink-driving, in a case that has embarrassed the local authority and raised questions about accountability among elected officials.

Peter Craske, who served as the chairman of the health and wellbeing board, pleaded guilty to driving with 54 micrograms of alcohol in 100 millilitres of breath - significantly above the legal limit of 35 micrograms. The offence occurred on November 18 last year along Trinity Road in Wandsworth.

Political Fallout

The conviction has triggered immediate political consequences, with Craske stepping down from his influential role overseeing health services in the borough. Wandsworth Council confirmed his resignation, stating they take such matters "extremely seriously" and expect all councillors to maintain the highest standards of conduct.

This isn't the first controversy to surround Craske during his political career. In 2016, he faced suspension from the Conservative party for his involvement in the contentious 'Battle for Tooting' election campaign, adding to the scrutiny surrounding his conduct as a public representative.

Legal Consequences

At Wimbledon Magistrates' Court, Craske received a 12-month driving ban and was ordered to pay £1,063 in fines and costs. The court heard how police stopped the councillor during the evening incident, with subsequent tests revealing he was over the legal alcohol limit.

The conviction comes at a sensitive time for local governance in Wandsworth, where public trust in elected officials remains paramount. Local residents have expressed disappointment at the incident, with many questioning how someone responsible for overseeing health and wellbeing services could demonstrate such poor judgement.

Broader Implications

This case raises wider questions about the conduct expected of public officials and the consequences when they fall short of expected standards. As communities look to their elected representatives for leadership, incidents like this undermine public confidence in local democracy.

The council has moved quickly to contain the damage, emphasising their commitment to maintaining high ethical standards among all members. However, the incident serves as a stark reminder that those in positions of public trust must lead by example in all aspects of their lives.