Keir Starmer has stepped down as prime minister, triggering a leadership contest in which Andy Burnham is the frontrunner. Readers of the Guardian have shared their reactions, ranging from anger to cautious optimism.
Betrayal of a decent leader
Arthur Gould, a Labour member since 1959, called the resignation 'an enormous betrayal.' He accused selfish MPs, opportunist cabinet members, and self-seeking lightweights of destroying the work of 'a decent, rational and honest man and prime minister.' Gould warned that the party would now lurch to the right, sending Labour into the political wilderness for a generation.
Starmer's contribution
Janet Tomlinson praised Starmer as 'a decent, competent, honest, informed politician' who provided stability after the chaos of Boris Johnson and Liz Truss. She thanked him for his efforts and wished him a happy retirement.
Maxine Melling drew a parallel to a hypothetical southern mayor, suggesting that commentators would not question a southern mayor's credentials as they do for Burnham, implying a double standard.
Criticism of Wes Streeting
Tim Burton criticised Wes Streeting's endorsement of Burnham, calling it 'meaningless bureaucratic tosh.' He argued that the country needs an economy rebalanced away from private profit and towards state investment, with progressive taxation to redistribute wealth.
Priorities and perception
Kathir Puvanachandra urged politicians to focus on how policies affect the country, not just their electability. He said honest intention matters more than perception.
Jefrey G Pirie noted that Starmer inherited a poisoned chalice and was relentlessly hammered by the rightwing press. He questioned the wisdom of changing leaders when the next one will face the same limited options.
Jonathan Harris pointed out that midterm changes to Theresa May, Boris Johnson, Liz Truss, and Rishi Sunak did not end well, suggesting this change will also be problematic.
