Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, has described how he was pulled from the rubble of a leadership compound after the US-Israeli airstrike that killed the country's supreme leader, Ali Khamenei, on the first day of the war. He has survived since by constantly moving around Tehran by car, he said in an interview with Iranian journalist Javad Mogouyi published online on Sunday.
Araghchi confirms accurate intelligence behind strike
Araghchi confirmed that Israel and the US had precise intelligence on the location of Khamenei and other officials, enabling them to target Iran's senior leadership. He said he had yet to meet the country's new leader, Khamenei's son Mojtaba, but described his appointment as sending “a very important message to the world that there would be no change in the regime's policies and ideals.”
Speaking before the resumption of all-out hostilities 10 days ago, Araghchi said he had always doubted that negotiations with the US earlier this year would work, but called them necessary even if there was only a 10% chance of success. “No one would be able to tell us that it was our fault,” he said.
Last-minute diplomacy and sudden US bellicosity
Araghchi confirmed that Iran had offered the US a deal on its nuclear programme in the final round of talks in Geneva. However, Oman's foreign minister, Badr Albusaidi, told him the following day that the mood in Washington had suddenly become more bellicose. The joint US-Israeli strikes began shortly after 9am the next day, when senior officials had gathered for meetings at the ministry of intelligence, the strategic council on foreign policy, and the defence council.
“What matters, in my view, is the fact that Israel had intelligence about these meetings,” Araghchi said, adding: “This may point to a security gap that probably still exists. This needs to be fixed.”
The moment of attack: three blasts in seconds
Araghchi was reporting back to Khamenei's deputy chief of staff, Ali Asghar Hijazi, when the building was shaken by three blasts within seconds. “The third explosion was almost next to our building. The section where Mr Hijazi's office was located was directly hit, and the left side of the building was completely destroyed.” Hijazi's secretary was killed instantly, but Araghchi and Hijazi escaped the full force of the detonation.
“We were on the other side of the building, and after the explosion, the ceiling, walls, and everything collapsed on us. I grabbed Mr Hijazi's hand, and we made our way through the beams and boards and pieces of wood, hearing the cries for help. Water was pouring from the ceiling. Everything was wrecked. We eventually got out, and I saw that various parts of the compound had been targeted.”
Aftermath and Iran's preparedness
Araghchi was rushed to the foreign ministry by a passerby since his official car had been hit. “For three days we were cut off from everything trying to find out who was alive and who had been martyred,” he said. “The enemy thought they could paralyse us by targeting leadership, but they failed.”
Araghchi said Iran had been prepared for such an attack and had already drawn up plans to close the strategic strait of Hormuz if the supreme leader was targeted. The codename for such a scenario was “Code 110”, a reference to the clause of Iran's constitution that lays out the supreme leader's powers.
US motivations and regional warnings
Araghchi said the US decided to attack because it believed Iran's government had been weakened abroad by blows to its proxies in Syria and Lebanon, and at home by economic protests – the speed and scale of which he admitted had surprised him. He said regional governments had counselled Donald Trump against war, arguing that attacking Iran would not be as easy as the US raid on Venezuela to abduct then-president Nicolás Maduro. “Iran is different. Its support is a several-thousand-year civilisation, combined with Shia thought and beliefs about martyrdom. When these combine, they create something that cannot be easily defeated,” he said.
Araghchi told Mogouyi that Iran had warned neighbouring governments that any attack would be met with retaliation against targets in the region. “If Israel hits our nuclear facilities, we will hit theirs. Our missiles do not reach America, so we will hit their bases, which are unfortunately in your countries. If they hit our oil facilities, we will ensure that nobody in the region can sell oil,” he said.
Turkey's role and Iran's missile improvements
He also said warnings to the Turkish government had prompted Ankara to shut down Trump's plan to encourage a Kurdish revolt from Iraq into Iran. Turkey's foreign minister, Hakan Fidan, “talked to the Americans and adopted a very firm position in this regard. A series of efforts foiled this plot,” Araghchi said.
He added that Iran was working to exacerbate divisions between the US and Israel. “There are sometimes conflicts of objectives and positions which can be played with,” he said, without giving details. Araghchi said that after Israel's 12-day bombing campaign against his country in 2025, Iran had improved its missile capabilities, reducing the time needed to reactivate a base after an attack from 10–15 hours to 35–40 minutes.
Diplomacy versus war
Discussing the choice of diplomacy or war, Araghchi said: “We do not fight unless the cost of not fighting is higher than the cost of fighting.”
