Waltham Forest Council Pays £275k in Compensation Over Ombudsman Complaints
Waltham Forest Council Pays £275k Over Ombudsman Complaints

Waltham Forest Council Compensates Residents with £275k Payout Following Ombudsman Investigations

Waltham Forest Council has been compelled to pay out more than £274,000 in compensation to residents during the 2024/25 financial year, according to recently released official figures. The substantial payout follows a series of successful complaints that were thoroughly investigated and upheld by the independent Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman (LGSCO).

Ombudsman Upholds Complaints Across Multiple Service Areas

The LGSCO, which acts as a critical adjudicator between residents and local authorities, upheld a total of 30 complaints against Waltham Forest Council, resulting in compensation payments of £11,625. These complaints primarily centered on three key areas: housing disputes, adult social care issues, and special educational needs (SEND) provision.

Specifically, the ombudsman investigated 21 complaints related to housing, adult social care, and SEND, representing a 70 percent uphold rate. While this figure remains notably high, it actually marks a significant improvement for the council compared to the previous year's 96 percent uphold rate and is below the 84 percent average for similar local authorities.

Breakdown of Compensation Payments by Complaint Category

The compensation payments were distributed across different service failures:

  • Housing options accounted for ten of the 30 investigated complaints, costing the council £4,765 in compensation
  • Adult social care complaints numbered eight investigations with total compensation of £950
  • Special educational needs (SEND) cases comprised four investigations resulting in £3,450 in payouts

These figures represent only the direct compensation ordered by the ombudsman, with the remaining £263,225 of the total £274,850 payout covering other complaint resolutions and administrative costs.

Ombudsman Criticizes Council's Response Times and Information Quality

In a strongly worded letter sent to Chief Executive Linzi Roberts-Egan in July, Local Government Ombudsman chair Amerdeep Somal expressed serious concerns about the council's handling of investigations. The correspondence highlighted "several occasions when our investigations were delayed by your council's failure to respond in a timely way to our requests for information."

The ombudsman revealed that in one particularly concerning case, delays were so extensive that investigators "took the unusual step of threatening to issue a witness summons before we received the information we needed. This is not a step we take lightly."

Beyond timing issues, the ombudsman noted "instances of poor quality, incomplete responses to our enquiries or draft decisions, which meant my staff spent time chasing additional information" - creating further delays in resolving residents' complaints.

Council Commits to Improvement Despite Compliance Record

Despite these criticisms, Waltham Forest Council maintains that it complied with 100 percent of the remedies requested by the ombudsman and has publicly committed to improving its complaint handling processes. The council previously acknowledged the need to "strengthen internal processes, apply policies consistently, and improve the quality of our responses" to prevent similar issues in future.

The substantial compensation payout highlights the ongoing challenges local authorities face in meeting service standards while dealing with complex resident complaints through independent oversight bodies like the LGSCO.