Breaking the Catastrophizing Cycle: How to Stop Assuming the Worst
Catastrophizing: How to Stop Assuming the Worst

Breaking the Catastrophizing Cycle: How to Stop Assuming the Worst

When your boss requests a meeting, do you instantly fear you are about to be fired? Or if your partner is late, do you imagine a horrific accident on the motorway? These patterns of catastrophic thinking, known as catastrophizing, are more common than you might think. This cognitive distortion involves leaping to the most extreme negative conclusions, often disproportionate to the actual threat. If you habitually follow this mental pathway, it can leave you feeling perpetually stuck in crisis mode, as if you are always on high alert.

What Exactly Is Catastrophizing?

Catastrophizing is a cognitive distortion characterized by automatically assuming the worst possible outcome in any given situation. According to Dr. Tom Zaubler, founder and medical director of Pegasus Psychiatry Associates, it is a very common cognitive process that everyone experiences occasionally. While occasional catastrophizing is normal, chronic patterns can be harmful. This type of thinking is more extreme than everyday worrying but stems from the same evolutionary roots. "It's adaptive to worry," Zaubler explains. "We would not survive long if we never felt any fear. There was a time when we were out foraging for food, and if we heard something rustling in the bushes and didn't take it seriously, that would be a problem." Often, catastrophizing serves as a defense mechanism against perceived threats like disappointment, rejection, abandonment, or failure, sometimes learned early in childhood.

The Harmful Effects of Chronic Catastrophizing

A chronic catastrophizer may find their threat detection system becomes overly sensitized to nearly everything, as Zaubler notes. Rather than protecting us, constant forecasting tends to backfire, leading to distress and negative impacts on mental wellbeing over time. Habitual catastrophizing can also affect how individuals approach opportunities in life, ultimately becoming very self-defeating. For example, a young person spiraling about failing an exam might predict rejection from university and never achieving anything, leading them to avoid taking the exam altogether. "It becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy," Zaubler warns.

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

Do Volatile Times Increase Catastrophizing?

Volatility in areas such as the economy, job market, or geopolitics breeds uncertainty, and the inability to tolerate uncertainty is central to catastrophizing. Bunmi O. Olatunji, a professor in the department of psychology and psychiatry at Vanderbilt University, points out that during the pandemic, society learned it struggles to tolerate uncertainty as a whole. "When there are things happening in the environment, the bottom line is we struggle to tolerate that anxiety ... and that is a foundation for catastrophizing," Olatunji says. Environmental stressors can set the stage for catastrophizing and make it difficult to distinguish between catastrophic thinking and realistic concerns. However, Zaubler clarifies that catastrophizing is different from being concerned about extreme events like war, noting that the world can be a scary place without equating genuine fear with cognitive distortion.

Practical Techniques to Stop Chronic Catastrophizing

Therapeutic techniques can help break the loop of catastrophic thinking. Different methods suit different people, according to Fairlee C. Fabrett, an assistant professor at Harvard Medical School and a director of training at McLean University.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration
  • Probability Testing: This technique involves examining evidence for and against the worst-case outcome and estimating its likelihood. For instance, someone catastrophizing about a plane crash might acknowledge the slim chances and contrast it with their lack of fear when driving daily. Probability testing comes from cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), which focuses on recognizing and challenging automatic thoughts.
  • Cognitive Defusion: Drawn from acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), this involves detaching from unhelpful thoughts. Zaubler suggests adding words like "I am thinking" to catastrophic forecasts (e.g., "I am thinking that I will lose my job") to create emotional distance. ACT techniques can be particularly effective for those resistant to changing their thoughts.
  • Honing Problem-Solving Skills: When catastrophizing, individuals often inflate the probability and severity of worst-case outcomes while underestimating their ability to cope. Olatunji recommends adopting a problem-solving mentality to recognize one's own agency and address controllable elements, thereby improving tolerance for uncertainty.
  • Mindfulness: Mindfulness exercises, such as imagining thoughts floating away on leaves in a river, can disrupt catastrophic thinking. Fabrett emphasizes practicing these strategies in the absence of crisis to build resilience for when needed.
  • Plan "Worry Time": Fabrett suggests setting aside dedicated time for catastrophizing to prevent it from seeping into the entire day. Set an alarm for 10 minutes, write out worst-case scenarios, acknowledge limited control, and then engage in a comforting activity like watching a favorite TV show.

When to Seek Therapy for Catastrophizing

Not everyone who catastrophizes needs therapy, as Zaubler notes. However, if catastrophic thinking persists on most days for several months, interferes with daily functioning, or is accompanied by depression or thoughts of self-harm, it is crucial to seek professional help. Olatunji adds that when persistent, repetitive thinking starts to interfere with valued aspects of life, it serves as an important marker for intervention.

Supporting a Loved One Who Catastrophizes

To support someone struggling with catastrophizing, Fabrett advises taking time to listen closely, ask open-ended questions, and be curious. "You don't need to agree with their worst-case scenario, but you can validate how they are feeling," she says, stressing that acknowledging feelings differs from agreeing with fears. Olatunji recommends nudging the person toward problem-solving by asking, "what do you want to do about that?" to shift focus from dwelling on negative thoughts to actionable steps.