Ancient Engravings Suggest Writing Origins 40,000 Years Earlier Than Believed
Writing May Have Begun 40,000 Years Earlier Than Thought

Groundbreaking Study Rewrites the History of Writing

A revolutionary new research project has uncovered evidence that the origins of writing may date back tens of thousands of years earlier than previously accepted. An international team of experts has analyzed ancient engravings on Stone Age artifacts, suggesting that humans were using sophisticated symbol systems as far back as 40,000 years ago. This discovery fundamentally challenges the long-standing assumption that writing first emerged in ancient Mesopotamia around 3,000 BCE.

Detailed Analysis of Prehistoric Artifacts

Led by linguist Christian Bentz from Saarland University and archaeologist Ewa Dutkiewicz from Berlin's Museum für Vor- und Frühgeschichte, the research team examined more than 3,000 engraved signs found on 260 prehistoric objects. These artifacts, dating from 34,000 to 45,000 years ago, were often decorated with repeated patterns of lines, dots, notches, and crosses. Many were discovered in caves within the Swabian Jura region of south-western Germany, a key area for such findings.

Notable examples include:

  • A small ivory mammoth figurine from Vogelherd Cave, engraved with rows of crosses and dots.
  • The Adorant, a mammoth ivory plate from Geißenklösterle cave, depicting a hybrid lion-human figure marked with dots and notches.
  • The Lion Human sculpture from Hohlenstein-Stadel Cave, featuring evenly spaced notches along its arm.

Researchers emphasize that these marks were not merely decorative or accidental. Professor Christian Bentz stated, 'Our research is helping us uncover the unique statistical properties – or statistical fingerprint – of these sign systems, which are an early predecessor to writing.'

Statistical Similarities to Proto-Cuneiform

Instead of trying to decipher the meanings of the signs, the team focused on measurable characteristics such as frequency and repetition. Using statistical modeling and machine learning techniques from quantitative linguistics, they digitized the sign sequences into a database. Bentz explained, 'In contrast, the signs on the archaeological objects are frequently repeated – cross, cross, cross, line, line, line. This type of repetition is not a feature found in spoken language.'

The study revealed a striking similarity between these ancient markings and proto-cuneiform, the earliest known writing system from Mesopotamia. Bentz noted, 'Our findings also show that Palaeolithic hunter-gatherers developed a system of symbols that has an information density that is statistically comparable to the earliest proto-cuneiform tablets from ancient Mesopotamia, which came 40,000 years later.' This similarity was unexpected, as researchers initially hypothesized that proto-cuneiform would resemble modern writing systems more closely.

Implications for Human Cognitive Development

The artifacts predate all known writing systems and originate from a period when Homo sapiens were spreading across Europe and encountering Neanderthals. Dutkiewicz highlighted that Palaeolithic humans were cognitively similar to people today, with the ability to record and share information being crucial for survival. She added, 'They were highly skilled craftspeople. You are able to see that they carried the objects with them. A lot of the objects fit right in the palm of your hand. That is another way in which the objects are similar to proto-cuneiform tablets.'

This research suggests that early humans had already developed advanced methods for storing and transmitting knowledge long before the advent of what we now recognize as writing. The findings indicate that symbolic encoding remained relatively unchanged for tens of thousands of years until a new system representing spoken language emerged around 5,000 years ago, bringing entirely different statistical characteristics.

While the study does not explain the specific meanings of the Stone Age signs, it provides a framework for narrowing down possible interpretations and opens new avenues for understanding human communication and cultural evolution.