E. Jean Carroll Seeks DOJ Probe of Trump, Reid Hoffman Backs Her
Carroll Seeks DOJ Probe of Trump, Hoffman Backs Her

E. Jean Carroll, the writer who accused former President Donald Trump of sexual assault, has called for a Department of Justice investigation into Trump’s conduct, with billionaire LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman reportedly backing her legal efforts. The move escalates a long-running legal battle that has drawn significant public attention.

Carroll’s Demand for DOJ Action

In a statement released on Thursday, Carroll urged the DOJ to investigate Trump for alleged misconduct, including defamation and sexual assault. She argued that Trump's actions, which she detailed in her 2019 memoir, warrant federal scrutiny. Carroll’s legal team has submitted evidence to the DOJ, claiming Trump’s statements about her constitute defamation and that his behavior while in office may have violated federal laws.

“The Department of Justice must hold Donald Trump accountable for his actions,” Carroll said. “No one is above the law, and that includes a former president.”

Wide Pickt banner — collaborative shopping lists app for Telegram, phone mockup with grocery list

Reid Hoffman’s Support

Reports indicate that Hoffman, a prominent Democratic donor and co-founder of LinkedIn, has been funding Carroll’s legal fees. Hoffman’s involvement has raised eyebrows, given his status as a major political contributor. However, his team maintains that the support is about upholding legal principles rather than partisan politics.

“Reid Hoffman believes in the rule of law and supporting individuals who seek justice,” a spokesperson said. “His assistance to Carroll is consistent with his long-standing commitment to legal accountability.”

The funding arrangement has drawn criticism from Trump’s allies, who view it as a politically motivated attack. Trump has denied all allegations and called the investigation a “witch hunt.”

Legal Implications

The DOJ has not yet confirmed whether it will open an investigation. Legal experts note that the case could set a precedent for how federal authorities handle allegations against former presidents. Carroll’s lawyers argue that Trump’s statements, made while he was president, were not official acts and thus not subject to immunity.

“This is about ensuring that powerful individuals face consequences for their actions,” said Roberta Kaplan, Carroll’s attorney. “We are confident the evidence will speak for itself.”

The case has already seen several twists, including a previous defamation lawsuit that was settled in 2022. Carroll’s current push for a DOJ investigation adds a new layer to the ongoing legal saga.

Pickt after-article banner — collaborative shopping lists app with family illustration