Pub Landlord Ordered to Halt Free Drunk Driver Service for Charity
A family-run village pub landlord in Kent has been instructed by local authorities to cease providing free lifts to intoxicated customers, even though the service was operated as a charitable initiative. Paul Hartfield, the landlord of The Flying Horse in Smarden, near Ashford, had been offering rides home to patrons within a three-mile radius, encouraging donations to the MND Association instead of charging fares.
Council Intervention Over Licensing Issues
Ashford Borough Council (ABC) intervened, citing that Mr. Hartfield lacked a taxi licence, which is required for any service involving the hire of a vehicle with a driver, regardless of whether payment is involved. The council acknowledged the good intentions behind the scheme but emphasized its regulatory duties to ensure public safety through proper licensing checks on drivers and vehicles.
In a statement, ABC explained that while exemptions exist for certain services like funeral cars or care-worker transport, a pub taxi service does not qualify. They have offered guidance on applying for the necessary licences but insisted the service must stop until compliance is achieved.
Landlord's Response and Community Impact
Mr. Hartfield expressed shock at the decision, arguing that his actions were no different from a friend giving a lift home. He highlighted that the service, which began three months ago, had already helped about 100 people get home safely and raised £700 for charity. He also pointed out inconsistencies, noting that child minders who transport children regularly do not face similar licensing requirements.
The pub's statement, provided to KentOnline, stressed that the service was not a business venture but a community-focused effort, especially given the area's poor road conditions with potholes, limited pavements, and no lighting. The attention from the ban has drawn widespread media interest, with many expressing horror at the restrictions on charitable acts.
Broader Implications and Public Reaction
This case raises questions about the balance between community spirit and regulatory frameworks. While the council prioritizes safety through licensing, supporters of Mr. Hartfield see it as an overreach that hinders grassroots efforts to prevent drunk driving and support charities. The debate continues as the landlord seeks legal advice, and the community watches closely for potential resolutions or changes in enforcement.
